On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 11:51:29AM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:00:07PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Hi folks > > > > Noone wants to say it, so I do: The kernel for etch is frozen. No > > updates shall be done except for security problems affecting the > > installer. > > [Shouldn't this be on debian-kernel-maint?] > > Thanks Bastian. > > Now, I'd like to create a process for tracking non-security changes > for incorporation in etch point releases. My personal preference is to > use usertags: > bts user debian-kernel@lists.debian.org , usertag NNNNNN > dkt-pending-etch-update > > Any bug that is of severity important or higher is a candidate for a > stable update. Of course, the stable release team needs to approve > each one. I would suggest that we track each issue via a bug report > and only add a fix to svn once the bug report has been approved by the > SRM team.
i'd like to continue to push the stable 2.6.16 serie patches, for the stable branch. > As for svn, how about we move sid/linux-2.6 to etch/linux-2.6 now, and > start a etch-security branch? Or is the convention that we should > leave it under sid/ until it has been superseded in sid? > > -- > dann frazier -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
