On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 08:45:55PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 05:27:22AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > Did you check for packages that have a dependency or build dependency on > > linux-2.6? They'd have to be re-uploaded too...
> we rename the source package, not the binary packages. No need to change > anything anywhere, we just want a new tarball in the archive :-) > The only real drawback will be the bugreports getting attached to linux-2.6.18 > instead of linux-2.6 (like we already had with .16). That's a big drawback. Please change the *version* of the package instead of changing the source package *name*. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
