On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:56:41AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > Per your blog post this morning > (http://www.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/blog/2006/11/07#2.6.18-status), > would you mind looking into the status of bug #394392?
thanks for the reminder, patch looks good for me. > I haven't seen any response from the kernel team, and as it's a LSB > issue, I'm very concerned that the fix gets into the kernel ASAP. > > I've attached a patch to the bug (straight from the Fedora Core kernel > package, and originally derived from the Linus tree for 2.6.19), but if > that patch is deemed to be too much for the current state of the kernel, > I can create an alternate patch which reverts msync() to the behavior in > 2.6.16 and earlier. no, but we want -5 to be build fixes only to get it into testing. -6 is open for the remaining bug fixes, will add it there soonest. only waiting for the vserver remainings thanks to ths and vorlon's commit. > Thanks! thank you, added bug report on cc -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
