On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 01:34:28AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I did not file this bugreport. I agree with the worried bugreporter, > but am not in the mood for fighting, so if you cannot use my attempts at > helping you to a deeper understanding of *why* we are worried, then so > be it.
the bugreporter packs an gpg key into the initrd, which is not a standard setup! i'm still waiting for a specific leakage that is happening in the initrd-tools and initramfs-tools generation in a Debian default setup. until a specific file is named there is no need for initramfs-tools to be paranoid. > If you believe yaird does things in a wrong way, then please discuss it > through bugreports against that package. i'm subuscribed to yaird bug reports and occisonaly i reply to them if they aquire attention. i've removed the patch tag, as the proposed patch is nacked, so we need for your loop-aes pleasure a specific config dir for mkinitramfs UMASK setting, other packages may want to set BUSYBOX=yes there or whatever. i'll prepare something that way for the next release, once 0.73e has hit testing. best regards -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
