On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:39:30AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060526 10:20]: > > Well, it was my understanding that both those packages where living in a > > differnt section, namely etch and etch-<whatever>, which would take care of > > the problem. Failing that, it is easy enough to handle the problem in the > > same > > way as we want to handle the sid/etch kernel dichotomy, in case we froze on > > a > > 2.6.16 kernel. > > Both packages will have to live in etch.
Ok, so we need to find a scheme which appends some tag or something to the module names. Ideally, this would be the full kernel version (2.6.16-2-<flavour>), which i believe would be enough for our purpose. kernel-package already does this for binary package, we only need to transpose this to the source package too, and everyone is happy. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
