On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:27:14AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060524 05:33]: > > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:46:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote: > > > > Kernel udeb creation process (possibly using k-p?) > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > If we build all of the *existing* udebs from a single source, we outgrow > > > > the limit of the Binary: field in the control file. > > > > > > Huh ? This problem is known since over 2 years now, and i thought it was > > > one > > > of the things that where fixed earlier this year or late last year ? > > > > Immediately after I sent out the notes from this meeting, aba said > > he'd followed up with an ftp master (neuro, iirc). From what he was > > told, it sounds like the information we had during this meeting was > > stale/inaccurate. > > Actually, if I understood everything correct, the issue with the long > lines used to be that on the way from the buildd to the buildd > maintainer, the long line in the changes-file could be broken by MTAs, > and this has been fixed. The best way to test if this is all would be to > upload one source package producing all udebs to experimental, and see > what happens.
A, good thinking. Who volunteers for doing so ? I don't think i am the right person, as i would again be seen as over-stepping my place, and stuff. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
