On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 12:24:57AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > I could also understand if m68k would keep a 2.4 kernel for a while > longer. As it is not a release arch, it might be acceptable for release > managers to keep a m68k 2.4 kernel in testing/unstable. > 2.2 should probably be dropped completely. > Whether we will be able to keep 2.4 support in d-i if all other > architectures have dropped it is uncertain though [1].
The m68k porters just had a discussion about this and we're fine with whatever ya'll decide to do. We can always keep some unofficial kernels and installers around if necessary. In other words, don't worry about holding on to any kernels just for us. I hope to keep some 2.4 and 2.2 support in d-i until we get everything moved, but I'll try to keep it out of the way or in a branch. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
