On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:57:06PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060513 02:00]: > > Of course, I do see the benefit to Bastian's suggestion - we'd have > > working metapackages for both sid & etch that pull in the latest > > available in that dist. My proposal leaves sid meta packages pointing > > at the latest kernel for etch. > > Actually, I see the sid meta packages pointing to the latest etch kernel > as a feature, as this makes sure that more boxes have these kernels > installed, and especially the d-i-build boxes will have the correct > kernel, which will help with d-i testing and final preparations for > etch.
I am not convinced that this d-i buildd infrastructure is sane though. I can hardly discuss this without being accused of attacking the d-i team, but the situation always made me a bit uneasy, and this forced to do manual .udeb transitions too. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
