On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:36:06PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:35:56PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > Hello Sven, > > > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:02:29AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > I am little interested in > > > going this way, if it means another flamewar between me and the d-i team, > > > with > > > everyone else watching silently. > > > > > > Andreas Barth, you claimed that you could see strong reason not to go this > > > way, please could you comment on them now in this thread. > > > > Please let's keep this problem you and some other developers have with > > each other out of here. IMHO it has reached a point where only personal > > mediation could help, and every additional word lost on it here or on > > IRC will just make it worse. > > Huh ? What has this to do with this ? Andreas told us on irc that he knew of > several serious reasons why we should not merge the .udebs into the linux-2.6 > package. I am just asking that he don't keep those reasons secret, but tell > them to us here. > > Is that also too much to ask ? > > > Sven: I would like you to not partecipate in any discussion concerning > > d-i or kernel udebs - at least as long as you use that very contribution > > to raise this issue again and again. > > Well, i am seriously interested in knowing what reservations Andreas had, that > he mentioned on irc, and have asked him now a couple of times to state them. I > believe that this information he has and seems unwilling to share for some > obscure reason, do indeed belong to this thread.
Oh well, it seems after all, Andreas Barth had no reservations, but only some second hand objections from the d-i team. Andreas, why didn't you say so the first time then ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
