On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 04:17:33AM -0800, Debian Installer wrote: > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the > override file for the following file(s): > > kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is > extra, override says optional. > kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra, > override says optional. > kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is > extra, override says optional. > kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra, > override says optional. > kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is > extra, override says optional. > kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is > extra, override says optional. > kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra, > override says optional. > kernel-image-power3_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra, > override says optional. > kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra, > override says optional. > kernel-image-power4_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra, > override says optional. > kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is > extra, override says optional. > kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra, > override says optional. > > Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think > the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package > so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the > override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.
Hi, ... these packages (in fact all the kernel-image-* packages) are now only meta-packages pointing at the right packages (linux-image-*) and used for backward compatibility. As thus, i believe, but am no expert, that the linux-image-* packages will stay at priority optional or something, and the new compatibility packages have a downgraded priority. So, it would be meaningful to either change the override file, or comment to us what the right priority should be. <disclaimer> priorities are rather neboulous to me, i am just a bit bored to see this mail at each upload since 2.6.12 now :) </disclaimer> Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
