On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 03:05:23PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 14, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Right, now I remember that nobody could explain why this is needed so I > refused to add to my package code to load ide-generic.
of course my test machines don't need it, but everyone else seem too. > Is there any reason to not reassign #352753 to initramfs-tools? there was no initramfs-tools upload in february, it is clearly a change to the udev hooks that broke the boot. > Error messages about any missing script, which used to be suppressed but > now may confuse users. ah no i've seen them too, yes there are looots. users may easily think they are fatal. > I have no specific critic, but every change I do to the initramfs > scripts which I do not fully uderstand has an higher probability to > introduce bugs. sorry for pushing the _id change, i will wait until fjp is online and ready for a debugging session to find a good solution to this. regards -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
