On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:51:29AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I forgot some.
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:39:50AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Okay. Lets take a look at the images:
> > i386:
> > * available:
> > - 486
> > - 686 (maybe we can adopt the lock-noop patch, see the xen repo for
> > references)
> > - 686-smp
> > - k7 (the same)
> > - k7-smp
> > * ready for merge:
> > - vserver-686 (here, I think, we really should add the mentioned
> > patch, as i386 have a too large overhead for locking)
> > - vserver-k7
> > * wanted:
> > - amd64-k8
> > - emt64-$bla
* requested for 2.6 boot-floppies
current 486 doesn't fit on them, not yet requested by the d-i folks
mentioned on irc as 2.6 requirement
- 486-bf
> > * requested for -media (I think):
> > - rt-686
> > - rt-k7
> * requested
> - laptop-686 (swsusp2)
> - laptop-k7 (the same)
nack
swsusp is getting better
no need for this fancy graphics
upstream working on userspace suspend.
> > * pending:
> > - xen-686
> > - xen-k7
* pending
- uml-686
- uml-k7
fancy list indeed.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
