On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:52:50PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 10, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 1) sarge-udev & etch-udev install concurently, maybe using the divert > > > > or > > > > alternative mechanism to not overwrite their files. > > > As I explained, I do not believe that on-disk co-existence of two udev > > > packages is feasible. > > Mmm, even if for a short time as planed here ? > I can't see how this would change anything.
Well, this could be part of a more generic roll-back of upgrades framework, which i believe would have interest beyond the kernel/udev issue, but this is vastly more work and time and effort than what we are speaking here. > > Well, less than 6 months now, so now is the best time to handle this. We > > still > > need to tackle the out-of-tree module issues, and the non-free firmware too. > FWIW, I plan to propose a GR to allow temporary distribution of > binary-only firmwares on our official install media. Well, given that we voted twice about this, and that it needs a 3:1 super-majority, i have some doubts of this passing. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
