On Fri, 2026-06-12 at 16:08 -0700, Jose R Rodriguez wrote: > On 2026-06-12 12:53, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Fri, 2026-06-05 at 12:27 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > [...] > > > I have *not* tested whether having these additional udebs available > > > will > > > affect the inclusion of packages in official installer builds for the > > > final point release. To test this, would it be sufficient to put them > > > in localudebs/, or should I put them in a local APT archive and add a > > > sources.list.udeb.local pointing at them? > > > > I tested a netinst build with the additional udebs available in > > localudebs/, and as intended and expected they were *not* included. > Just an experienced -based observation, Ben: > When I build reiser4 udebs for AMD64 architecture, after placing them > under localudebs/, I still have to reference those in file: > build/pkg-lists/netboot/amd64.cfg > otherwise, those unofficial udebs are not included in the final netinst > build image. > > Accordingly, if your intention is to include in the final netinst image > those unofficial UDEB packages under localudebs/, [...]
No, that is precisely what I *don't* want to happen. My intent is that users who need Linux 6.12 on bookworm will still have that with security support, but the standard install media should be unaffected. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings No political challenge can be met by shopping. - George Monbiot
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
