-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:49:33 +0100 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There is no build directory for official kernels, and the only > > > valid point for the build symlink to point to is the dir provided > > > by the header package, so there is no build directory, the kernel > > > headers are installed, then per your own words, the build symlink > > > should point to this, independently of if the kernel-image is > > > installed or not. This is what we actually agreed upon, and if > > > k-p did this, nobody would ever be complaining. > > > > WHO agreed upon this? Why was I not in that loop? And why > > must > > You, me, jonas, everyone that followed that discussion. Correct that I followed the discussion. Incorrect that I agreed with the above. And please follow Debian mailinglist guidelines and don't cc me if responding to this: I am subscribed to this list. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDxOiGn7DbMsAkQLgRAsuOAJsGCaJxzPZ7V/o9rzgomEWI5uzm+gCePVXq IyXaPDTir6xqpowqooFpSHA= =ZKrj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
