On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:01:34AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > Also, using 2.6.12/14/15 in Sarge (volatile) IMO means that the kernel > > team will need to commit to maintaining that version with regard to > > security updates, just as for 2.6.8. > > Continuously making the latest kernel available for Sarge through volatile > > IMO is not an option, unless maybe done through a separate repository > > kernel-volatile with all due warnings of "use at your own risk" attached. > > Including whatever kernel is in testing might work, hopefully that > kernel would not have major development bugs and we[1] still have to > support it for security.
Oh, i misread you, i favour the etch kernel myself. The alternative being some random kernel tree out there whe have no support at all (security or other) for right now, which i believe is not viable. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
