On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:27:23PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 19 December 2005 22:54, Maximilian Attems wrote: > > currently d-i unstable uses 2.6.12/2.6.14 depending on arch - > > next beta is planed for 2.6.15 so latest 2.6.15 is more important. > > OTOH the time to test with 2.6.15 will probably be quite short, so testing > d-i for hppa with 2.6.14 (using udev instead of discover etc.) would be > very useful. > > Also, if 2.6.14 is allowed to migrate to testing before 2.6.15 is > released, we may well end up basing beta2 on 2.6.14 after all if 2.6.15 > proves to have problems.
Well, last i spoke to Steve about this, he was not so interested in moving 2.6.14 to testing while the initramfs ramdisk generation tools where still a bit rough, so i guess we will soon have 2.6.12/2.6.15. Not sure what this means for the beta2, but if things go badly, it would be best to delay it a bit or something. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
