Re: Package for development of out-of-tree kernel modules written in Rust

[Miguel Ojeda]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 7:24 PM NoisyCoil <noisyc...@disroot.org> wrote:
>
> It does indeed depend on the configuration, because at least some
> abstractions are enabled via the configuration and different metadata
> will be produced depending on whether they are or not (Miguel should
> confirm this, but I'm pretty sure about it). The first example that
> comes to my mind is the firmware abstractions, which are already in
> stable. So it can't go in linux-kbuild, and if it can't go in
> linux-headers either then it needs a new package.

I was referring to the `.so`, not the `.rmeta`s, i.e. I thought Ben
was referring to the last paragraph quoted.

The `.rmeta`s definitely depend on the kernel config (and always
will). The `.so` do not get the config passed right now, but we may
end up passing it if we need it. So I would just assume they do.

Cheers,
Miguel