Hi Salvatore,there are still stalls logged, but I don't experience any slowness (though I haven't used the system around the times the stalls were logged). Logs attached.
thanks Willi Am 25.11.24 um 22:39 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Willi, On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 10:35:08PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:Hi Willi, On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 09:47:06PM +0100, Willi Mann wrote:Hi Salvatore, Am 21.11.24 um 17:02 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:hi,Can you please provide a full boot log to see if we can pin-point the cause?Full log of a boot with the 6.1.0-28 version attached - which after some time running unfortunately also shows the "detected stalls" message. However, the system does not feel slow with this version. So I tried again with the 6.1.0-27 version which now also does not feel slow. I'm wondering whether the previously observed slowness with the 6.1.0-27 version is just a coincidence and is not related "detected stalls". If you think this is helpful, I could let the 6.1.0-26 run for a few days to find out whether it is really a regression or might be caused by an "external" issue.I do realize this might be time consuming, but if you can do this test, and then provide full boot logs for both the run with the working and the first non-working kernel to see if we can spot something that would be great. It might be worth now waiting for the 6.1.119-1 update, which I plan to do soonish as we fix with it #1086447 and #1087602 already.6.1.119-1 has been released. Are you still experiencing the issue with that version? Regards, Salvatore
kernel.log.xz
Description: application/xz
