Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> (2024-12-15): > On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 05:14:55PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 04:38:57AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >> > >>Any thoughts about my proposal to lift that expectation? > > > >That looks eminently possible as a workaround at the very > >least. Working on it now. > > In fact, simpler answer: there was already code in > tools/generate_di_list to cope with udebs for multiple kernel versions > in the archive. The change of package names for udebs (no ABI included > now) broke a regexp there. I've fixed things up to cope with either > style, and that should do what we want here.
OK, thanks. I had decided to wait a little for some possible feedback before spending time looking into it on my own, I should have looked directly… :/ > >And yes: we should definitely ensure that the first image in each set > >has linux-image-$foo and all dependencies. And fail the build > >otherwise - this is critical, as you say! > > Looking at this next. Thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
