Bug#1086503: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits

[Ben Hutchings]

On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 12:38 +0000, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> Hi;
> 
> In order to be clear the underlying request is to add 32 bit equivalents of 
> 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits and make 
> sense
> 
> the second wave of crypto instructions (sha3, sha512) was not added to arm32

Please contact upstream (linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org) directly
to make this request.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit.
It's the only way to be sure.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part