Hey guys, On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 07:51:40AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> (2024-09-03): >> Right, this is sensible. We have currently the FTBFS for 6.10.7-1 for >> riscv64 and arm64 which needs to be sorted. We either can have this >> fixed isolated or do a 6.10.8-1 with the build failure fixes? Is this >> near enough timewise? > >I don't have any preferences regarding a future wholesale 6.10.y or just >a new revision of the current upstream release. It'd probably just make >sense to avoid upgrading to 6.11.y since I'd guess we would get more >things to look at. > >I'll let Steve comment on the preferred timings.
Let's go, I think - if the 6.10.8-1 upload builds and migrates OK then let's try and get a d-i release built with that. I should have time in the next week or two (at least) to help pull that through. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "When C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a thumb." -- Steven M. Haflich
