so, I'm ready to test something, especially since I have btrfs snapshots configured.
11 февраля 2024 г. 22:21:23 GMT+03:00, Diederik de Haas <didi.deb...@cknow.org> пишет: >Control: reassign -1 firmware-amd-graphics 20230210-5 >Control: retitle -1 firmware-amd-graphics: Please backport newer firmware to >Bookworm >Control: tag -1 -moreinfo >Control: severity -1 wishlist > >On Sunday, 11 February 2024 20:11:19 CET saber716rus wrote: >> В Вс, 11/02/2024 в 19:48 +0100, Diederik de Haas пишет: >> > Control: tag -1 moreinfo >> > >> > On Saturday, 10 February 2024 17:41:43 CET Nikolay Sabelnikov wrote: >> > > Package: linux-image-amd64 >> > > Version: 6.1.76-1 >> > > >> > > > update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.1.0-18-amd64 >> > > > W: Possible missing firmware >> > > > /lib/firmware/amdgpu/ip_discovery.bin for module amdgpu >> > > > ... >> > > > W: Possible missing firmware >> > > > /lib/firmware/amdgpu/psp_13_0_11_ta.bin >> > > > for module amdgpu >> > >> > What I see in these messages that it's requesting new(er) *firmware* >> > files, but the bug title implicates that there is a *kernel* module >> > missing. >> > The latter would be very surprising and would make your/any graphics >> > output on AMD GPUs not work. >> > Can you confirm it's actually a firmware issue? >> >> there are no errors in dmesg. and I don't see any graphical artifacts, >> but the error about the lack of modules is very alarming to me. > >Apparently some new (AMD) kernel files have been backported to the 6.1 branch, >which causes it to request firmware files which didn't exist when 6.1 was >released. >I've reassigned and changed this bug report into a request for a backport of >newer firmware files for Bookworm, although I'm not so sure that's a good idea. > >While it may look alarming, it's highly likely harmless. Just noisy.
