After a test, the patch at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3122#note_2252835 is working fine on my side. Many thanks to Diederik!
Le dim. 28 janv. 2024 à 15:00, Diederik de Haas <didi.deb...@cknow.org> a écrit : > > Patrice, > > On Sunday, 28 January 2024 11:44:59 CET Linux regression tracking (Thorsten > Leemhuis) wrote: > > On 27.01.24 14:14, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > In Debian (https://bugs.debian.org/1061449) we got the following > > > quotred report: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 07:38:16PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > > >> Giving a try to 6.7, here is a message extracted from dmesg: > > >> [ 4.177226] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > >> [ 4.177227] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 248 at > > >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/link/link_factory.c:387 > > >> construct_phy+0xb26/0xd60 [amdgpu] > > > > > > [...] > > > > Not my area of expertise, but looks a lot like a duplicate of > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3122#note_2252835 > > > > Mario (now CCed) already prepared a patch for that issue that seems to work. > > If you can build and test a kernel with the `test-patches` script like before > with the attached patch, but *without* the previous patch (which just reverted > commit b17ef04bf3a4346d66404454d6a646343ddc9749), that would be really useful. > > When you've done that, do a Reply-All to Thorsten Leemhuis' message so that > everyone sees the results. Optionally also reply to the gitlab issue Thorsten > mentioned. > > (It didn't seem useful to send these instructions to all the people/lists)
