Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 06:43:11PM +0100, Kjell M. Myksvoll wrote: > Package: ecdh-nist-p256 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: kjell.myksv...@gmail.com > > Dear Maintainer, > > *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** > > * What led up to the situation? > > Reboot after package updates. > > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > * What was the outcome of this action? > > [ 3.334317] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 3.334319] alg: self-tests for ecdh-nist-p256 using > ecdh-nist-p256-generic failed (rc=-14) > [ 3.334325] WARNING: CPU: 27 PID: 461 at crypto/testmgr.c:5936 > alg_test+0x516/0x630 > [ 3.334331] Modules linked in: ecdh_generic(+) ecc crc16 amdgpu(+) > i2c_algo_bit drm_ttm_helper ttm video drm_suballoc_helper amdxcp drm_buddy > gpu_sched drm_display_helper drm_kms_helper xhci_pci nvme drm xhci_hcd > nvme_core t10_pi crc32c_intel cec usbcore crc64_rocksoft crc64 rc_core > crc_t10dif crct10dif_generic crct10dif_pclmul crct10dif_common usb_common > gpio_amdpt wmi gpio_generic > [ 3.334369] CPU: 27 PID: 461 Comm: cryptomgr_test Not tainted > 6.5.0-5-amd64 #1 Debian 6.5.13-1 > [ 3.334372] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME > X399-A, BIOS 1601 04/14/2023 > [ 3.334374] RIP: 0010:alg_test+0x516/0x630 > [ 3.334377] Code: ff ff 4c 89 e6 4c 89 e7 41 89 c7 e8 e4 f4 fe ff e9 37 ff > ff ff 44 89 f9 48 89 ea 4c 89 ee 48 c7 c7 38 08 0c 98 e8 1a 5d b5 ff <0f> 0b > e9 7d fe ff ff 48 89 c2 48 89 ee 48 c7 c7 70 07 0c 98 45 89 > [ 3.334379] RSP: 0018:ffffbd2844e97e10 EFLAGS: 00010286 > [ 3.334381] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000007e RCX: > c0000000ffff7fff > [ 3.334383] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000ffff7fff RDI: > 0000000000000001 > [ 3.334385] RBP: ffff987682aeee00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: > ffffbd2844e97ca0 > [ 3.334386] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffff987deedfffe8 R12: > 000000000000007f > [ 3.334388] R13: ffff987682aeee80 R14: 00000000ffffffff R15: > 00000000fffffff2 > [ 3.334390] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff987def0c0000(0000) > knlGS:0000000000000000 > [ 3.334392] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > [ 3.334393] CR2: 00007fe96d9ba840 CR3: 000000010c7ea000 CR4: > 00000000003506e0 > [ 3.334395] Call Trace: > [ 3.334398] <TASK> > [ 3.334399] ? alg_test+0x516/0x630 > [ 3.334401] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 > [ 3.334406] ? alg_test+0x516/0x630 > [ 3.334409] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 > [ 3.334413] ? prb_read_valid+0x1b/0x30 > [ 3.334417] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x10 > [ 3.334422] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x80 > [ 3.334426] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 > [ 3.334429] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 > [ 3.334435] ? alg_test+0x516/0x630 > [ 3.334438] ? psi_memstall_leave+0xb0/0xb0 > [ 3.334441] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x10 > [ 3.334444] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x8f/0x2d0 > [ 3.334449] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x10 > [ 3.334452] ? __schedule+0x3e2/0xb20 > [ 3.334457] ? __pfx_cryptomgr_test+0x10/0x10 > [ 3.334460] cryptomgr_test+0x24/0x40 > [ 3.334464] kthread+0xe8/0x120 > [ 3.334468] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > [ 3.334471] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 > [ 3.334475] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > [ 3.334478] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 > [ 3.334486] </TASK> > [ 3.334487] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > * What outcome did you expect instead? > > No stack dump.
Please test 6.6.13-1 from unstable and 6.7.1-1~exp1 from experimental as the 6.5.y series won't get any more updates. Does the bug show up there as well? Regards, Salvatore
