On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 12:43:20PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 11:49:11AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > >... > > > - Relese the DSA without armel builds. This is not optimal and for the > > > point release > > > we need to have to have all builds, but this gives people who still are > > > interested > > > in this architecture to step up and propose a fix for the problem, > > > otherwise then > > > disable the image size check, and then effectively dropping some > > > support. > > >... > > > armel people, can you have ideally look at it ASAP on the comments > > > please, I would not like to delay the DSA for linux on > > > bookworm-security too much. > > > > Releasing this DSA without armel and sorting out the issue for the point > > release sounds like the best option to me. > > FWIW, following Ben's aproach for unstable, here is my proposed change > for bookworm in the near-term: > > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/844 > > I have verified by cross-building that the image size goes down to > > Image size 2644124/2729712, using 96.86%. Image fits. Continuing. > > which would be sufficient so far. > > So we can at least include the above for the point release and > releasing the DSA earlier without the armel builds.
Looks good to me. Thanks! > > Thank you! > > Regards, > Salvatore > -- rsa4096: 3B10 0CA1 8674 ACBA B4FE FCD2 CE5B CF17 9960 DE13 ed25519: FFB4 0CC3 7F2E 091D F7DA 356E CC79 2832 ED38 CB05
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
