Am Dienstag, den 22.11.2005, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Maximilian Attems: > [ please open new bug reports for newer issues ] > aboves bug report was about enabling swsusp.
Umm, actually it was 'Please consider including "suspend to disk" option' and that could mean anything from please enable CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND to please make it work, but hey, sorry anyway. > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 11:39:13AM +0100, Thomas Maier wrote: > > > > I happily discovered that CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is enabled in my > > 2.6.14-2-686 kernel (version 2.6.14-3) and tried to suspend to disk. > > Unfortunately it refused to suspend and after googling for a while it > > seems to me that the problem is that the IDE drivers are still compiled > > as modules. See LKML, thread > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110789542400001&r=1&w=2 > > > > However, it is quite old. So am I able to suspend to disk with the > > Debian kernel image somehow or would I have to recompile with the IDE > > stuff builtin? > > looks like. > suse has a swsusp patch for modular ide, will try to dig it up. Great. Thanks for the very quick reply. Would that patch be included in the standard linux-image package so I would not need to recompile? And would that need support from yaird to trigger a resume? Or at least not mount the file system before a resume is triggered? I googled for a while and found http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=329319 and it seems to me this might be relevant, although it is about suspend2. Sorry for being so clueless, Thomas. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
