On 4/19/23 11:46, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 09:39:14AM +0200, Yoann Congal wrote: >> On 4/19/23 08:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >>> Hi Yoann, >> >> Hi! >> >>> >>> Thanks for providing the merge request. Just for cross-reference and >>> transparency: This change cannot go anymore for bookworm, but we can >>> pick it up for trixie. >> >> Yeah, I understood that it won't go into bookworm as I was a bit >> late for that, but that's OK. >> AFAIK it will end up in backports so we could have bookworm + >> backported kernel with this module activated, or am I wrong? > > No that is correct assumption. Once bookworm-backports opens (and > someone in the team picks it), the version from the upper suite can go > into bookworm-backports, and that will have the same configuration > basis, so include the activated module as well. > > So in short, correct.
Awesome! Thanks! -- Yoann Congal Smile ECS - Tech Expert
