On Saturday, 4 February 2023 22:12:24 CET Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Right, I agree this should be a package of its own. I didn't know > > raspi-nonfree came from a "coherent" set of firmware sources provided > > by a single upstream. It is a distorsion that peopleinterested in > > brcmfmac firmware have to install raspi-firmware if they have > > different hardware. > > So I guess we can close this bug here, and the files can be shipped > with a new dedicated source package containing the firmware files, > since the last option of having them merged upstream in > linux-firmware.git seems unrealistic for now?
We could do that, but wouldn't it make more sense to reassign it to wnpp (?) and turn it into a RFP type bug? That way we would preserve the history (and thus useful info) of this issue. My 0.02
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
