Hey Salvatore. On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 06:49 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > I did decide to still do so, so we can have the CVE fix migrate > finally to testing (which took some time as well given there was the > perl transition ongoing).
Fine for me... I think it would be nice if there was a better mechanism to have bugs shown in apt-listbugs out of the box, while still not preventing migration to testing. Oh and another off-topic thing: Right now the kernel image meta-packages depend on the (secure boot) signed version of that... and it seems that these take always longer to be available than the unsigned ones. However, if people want the nice service to have linux-image-amd64 installed and pull in just the current package, they need to wait for the signed one to become available - even if they don't use secure boot at all. So question is,.. would it make sense to request that linux-image-amd64 depends on the signed | unsigned version? > I did import already 6.0.5 and will upload next so we get the btrfs > fix. And I have made the bug now as well again back RC severity. Thanks as always for your continued efforts. Cheers, Chris.
