I believe the Asahi team has them all submitted via the various relevant maintainers and they are working their way through the groups. Some patches make significant changes and there is obviously discussion about whether they need to be reworked before being passed up.
That said there was this recently on the 5.19 kernel release from Linus Torvalds... https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wgrz5BBk=rcz7w28fj_o02s0xi0oeq3h1uqgodfvhg...@mail.gmail.com/T/#u "... On a personal note, the most interesting part here is that I did the release (and am writing this) on an arm64 laptop. It's something I've been waiting for for a _loong_ time, and it's finally reality, thanks to the Asahi team. We've had arm64 hardware around running Linux for a long time, but none of it has really been usable as a development platform until now. ..." On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 16:06, Marc Haber <mh+debian-ker...@zugschlus.de> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 11:36:40AM +1000, Andrew Worsley wrote: > > Thanks Diederik, so I'm guessing 173 is way too much but a lot of it > might > > not > > be critical to something running on the M1 (versus M2). > > > > If I was to find a smaller set of say 10 patches to 5.19 that booted a > > usable > > system would I be able to submit those patches some where for building > > (arm64 of course)? > > Is there any reason why you don't take those patches upstream where they > belong? > > Greetings > Marc > > -- > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header > Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 > Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421 >
