Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:42:11 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#252335: "tc filter ls .." makes a kernel oops
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2004 19:34:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 02 12:34:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.itanets.com [216.12.200.84]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BVbV3-00010P-00; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 12:34:09 -0700
Received: (qmail 12703 invoked by uid 104); 2 Jun 2004 19:34:08 -0000
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by smtp.itanets.com by uid 107 with
qmail-scanner-1.16
(clamscan: 0.67. Clear:.
Processed in 1.83024 secs); 02 Jun 2004 19:34:08 -0000
Received: from office.itanets.com (HELO deb-off.itanets.com) (193.200.14.52)
by smtp.itanets.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2004 19:34:06 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Delian Krustev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: "tc filter ls .." makes a kernel oops
Bcc: Delian Krustev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:33:53 +0300
X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686
Version: 2.4.26-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-dm-pom-1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686 depends on:
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.0.91-2 The GNU core utilities
ii fileutils 5.0.91-2 The GNU file management utilities
ii initrd-tools 0.1.70 tools to create initrd image for p
ii modutils 2.4.26-1 Linux module utilities
-- no debconf information
deb-off:~# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 1024kbit latency 10ms burst 4096
deb-off:~# tc filter ls dev eth0
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
printing eip:
00000000
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[<00000000>] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010246
eax: 00000000 ebx: c688d180 ecx: c6d38840 edx: c8854ba0
esi: c7078400 edi: c1560460 ebp: c6bf8af0 esp: c0c1dc40
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Process tc (pid: 825, stackpage=c0c1d000)
Stack: c01cef4a c7f94e60 00000000 00000000 c010905c c0c1dc5c 00000002 00000000
c8854ba0 00000000 c7f94e60 c688d180 000001f0 c764fa40 c58657c0 c01bd8a4
c11876a8 000001f0 c58657c0 c1560460 c688d180 c1560460 c1560460 c58657c0
Call Trace: [<c01cef4a>] [<c010905c>] [<c8854ba0>] [<c01bd8a4>] [<c01d0c21>]
[<c8854be8>] [<c01d0e3f>] [<c01ca21a>] [<c01ceea0>] [<c01c9d70>] [<c01d0c55>]
[<c01d0e3f>] [<c01ca21a>] [<c01c9e30>] [<c01d0aca>] [<c01d0326>] [<c01d081f>]
[<c01ba2c4>] [<c01bb7fb>] [<c012c1a7>] [<c012c3a7>] [<c0118bc8>] [<c01bac7d>]
[<c01bbcd2>] [<c0118a50>] [<c010905c>] [<c0108f6b>]
Code: Bad EIP value.
Segmentation fault
---------------------
I have the following patches applied to the kernel:
1. CONNMARK from the latest patch-o-matic when this kernel package was
released. It's available from netfilter.org
2.linux-2.4.22-VFS-lock.patch
linux-2.4.22-devmapper-ioctl.patch
These are available from sistina.com (they've released patches for 4.26
probably a month later).
I wonder whether someone could reproduce this ?
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 252335-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2005 03:35:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 19:35:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from koto.vergenet.net [210.128.90.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZKGH-0006Vh-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:35:05 -0800
Received: by koto.vergenet.net (Postfix, from userid 7100)
id 841EE3404F; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:34:34 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:42:11 +0900
From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#252335: "tc filter ls .." makes a kernel oops
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Cluestick: seven
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:00:29PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Isn't the bug resolved ? The proposed patch is now in 2.4.27...
Thanks, closing accordingly.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
