[oh! I'm readding [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:53:01PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:03:09 +0100 > Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's legal for mount to have such entries so I'd suggest decreasing > > that check. > > How do you come to this conclusion?
do you mean the conclusion that it's legal for mount to accept 3-fields lines? simple, I can mount and umount that fs with no problems and the behaviour is the same as having 'defaults' as the only option. Anyway the point I'm trying to make is that yaird is not an fstab syntax checker and since mount accepts 3-fields only lines yaird shouldn't be so picky about it. (Also, maybe I'm blind but I don't see any specific usage for the opts field in FsTab). Making yaird the only[1] tool refusing to parse such line doesn't seem a nice goal. [1]: mount and gkrellm both work :) sorry, don't have tested more of them. Oh, also `mount -o '' /dev/hda5 /mnt/tmp0` works. That's all. It's just a suggestion, if you don't feel is't worth implementing just close this bug (this is specifically related to 3-fields fstab lines). -- mattia :wq!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature