-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 20:31:03 +0200 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 07:57:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Your description above ignores legacy ramdisk tools when part of a > > list[2]. We agreed on including legacy tools even when not > > explicitly set in /etc/kernel-kpg.conf. > > No, how do you expect to make this happen. [snip] > We have some time until the etch release to fine-tune this though. I wanted the world to not have a wrong idea of what we agreed on. Let's not annoy them with the details: I'll show you in d-k SVN! Please respond only to debian-kernel on this mail. > This will do for now, but once we agree to return 2, we can modify > this further, what do you think. I think "let's instead look at my proposal[1] instead of hacking more than absolutely necessary[2] on kernel-package". - Jonas [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/10/msg00798.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/10/msg00826.html - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDW+RTn7DbMsAkQLgRAqLYAKCg8YOLeeqZeHiBn5SM2EMrBzI/NgCfaUaS e+0hhKaeThGP61zTztgRz/Q= =P7UZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
