On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 02:20:53PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:30:28 +0100 > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 01:09:59PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:45:13PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > I am, right at this moment, building 2.6.13-1.experimental.1, and > > > > > > This should be 2.6.13-0.experimental.1, which would be lower than > > > 2.6.13-1 which we would upload to unstable. Don't forget to make > > > sure you include the .orig tarball though, as i don't think it is > > > included in 0.experimental.1 by default. > > > > That ought to be 2.6.13-0experimental1, otherwise various bits of the > > archive maintenance software will treat it as a binary-only NMU in > > some ways and get confused. I've made that mistake before ... > > Oh, didn't know that. Is it (pseudo)documented anywhere? > > I think I experienced once that a 0alphanum1 would not get upgraded > automatically to a 0alphanum2 package. But if this is the proper way > then I must've been dreaming.
For the record, Sven and I decided to go with 2.6.13-1, to avoid confusion and some internal packaging complications. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
