[ CC tbm ] On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 01:48:51PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> Did you had a chance to look at Ben's suggestions or ideas? >> We would like to ideally upload a 4.15.x based version to unstable >> (currently imported 4.15.4). > > I would start with disabling it. The armel architecture (not armhf) will > most likely not be part of Buster anyway.
I'm sorry that I still didn't find a way to make armel kernel within 2MB. So I will trigger the easy fix that increase the limit to 3MB, which probably break quite a few qnap boxes. Before Buster release, we still have chance to bring qnap support back, if I or other maintainer find a way.. > For the current state see > https://release.debian.org/buster/arch_qualify.html Sorry to hear that. But I think armel should share the same status with armhf. Anyway, this is another topic to discuss, which is better shouting to d-d in a new thread. Cheers, -- Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
