On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 06:55:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 05:11, Horms wrote: > > We spoke about this last month (or was it earlier this month, > > I forget), and at that time 2.6.8 was still being used by d-i. > > It seems that the transition to 2.6.12 is going pretty well, > > is the d-i team happy for 2.6.8 to be removed from the archive, > > or would they like it left there for a bit longer? > > We now have most things needed to support 2.6.12 in place in testing. This > means that it should be OK to remove 2.6.8.
Cool :) > Note that 2.6.13 should _not_ yet be uploaded to unstable as we still need > the final builds of 2.6.12-10 kernel udebs to migrate from unstable to > testing. Huh ? The packages are in etch, they need to be hand-installed anyway, so i don't really understand what is the problem here. I think this part of the process is a bit messy and i wonder what can be done to make it more smooth (apart from building the kernel .udebs from the kernel packages as i have been proposing before :) Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
