On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:43:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Not a good idea. Why clutter the namespace of versions in order to adapt > > > to > > > non-debian needs. ? What is it you intent to do anyway ? > > Thanks to Bastian Blank, code was added to make your life easier, > /proc/version now shows the debian version after the kernel version as : > > (Debian 2.6.13-1) > > For example, not yet in released packages, and will not account for self > compiled kernels from the debian sources, but it should be usefull to you.
Yes, that's nice thanks! Could you show me a full /proc/version? It's unfortunate my current client isn't logging /proc/version yet, so I should update the client soon. Logging /proc/version is a good idea anyway to know the compiler used. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
