On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 16:26 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>>
>> Processing raised an exception: mipsr6 is not a valid architecture name or
>> wildcard.
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 968, in
>> check
>> final_suites = self._final_suites()
>> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 857, in
>> _final_suites
>> if self._check_new(suite, overridesuite):
>> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 822, in
>> _check_new
>> if self._check_new_binary_overrides(suite, overridesuite):
>> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 786, in
>> _check_new_binary_overrides
>> packages = source.package_list.packages_for_suite(suite)
>> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 128,
>> in packages_for_suite
>> built = entry.built_in_suite(suite)
>> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 58,
>> in built_in_suite
>> built_on_arch = self.built_on_architecture(arch.arch_string)
>> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 49,
>> in built_on_architecture
>> if match_architecture(architecture, arch):
>> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/architecture.py", line 94,
>> in match_architecture
>> raise InvalidArchitecture('{0} is not a valid architecture name or
>> wildcard'.format(wildcard))
>> InvalidArchitecture: mipsr6 is not a valid architecture name or wildcard
I'd guess that the `dpkg' should upgrade on dak machine?
>
> OK, what's the story here? This had better get fixed quickly,
> otherwise I'm going to have to revert the package changes.
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer
--
YunQiang Su
