On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > http://www.debian.org/devel/testing : > > > > 2. It must be compiled and up to date on all architectures it has previously > > been compiled for in unstable; > > Mmm, so not only adding new binary packages, but removing them also needs > manual processing ?
No; removing an _architecture_ requires manual processing. > Is at least this removal not something that could be automated ? Just > curious about this one. It would seem to me that the difference between 'an oversight' and 'an intentional omission' is hard to automatedly find. Could be wrong, though. -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
