On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 00:13 -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote: > Including missing arm header references from the arm64 headers: > asm/opcodes.h:#include <../../arm/include/asm/opcodes.h> > asm/xen/hypervisor.h:#include <../../arm/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h> > asm/xen/page.h:#include <../../arm/include/asm/xen/page.h> > asm/xen/page-coherent.h:#include <../../arm/include/asm/xen/page-coherent.h> > asm/xen/hypercall.h:#include <../../arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h> > asm/xen/interface.h:#include <../../arm/include/asm/xen/interface.h>
Yuck. I don't really want to add a special case for this.
I wonder whether it would make more sense to make linux-headers-
<abiname>-common arch-independent, which I kind of wanted to do anyway.
That would expand the installed size by about 35-60% depending on which
architecture we compare with. What do you think?
Ben.
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo.salv...@linaro.org>
> ---
> debian/rules.real | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/debian/rules.real b/debian/rules.real
> index c9b44a2..e6d3ace 100644
> --- a/debian/rules.real
> +++ b/debian/rules.real
> @@ -269,6 +269,17 @@ install-headers_$(ARCH)_$(FEATURESET):
> $(STAMPS_DIR)/source_$(FEATURESET)
> ) \
> | \
> cpio -pd --preserve-modification-time '$(CURDIR)/$(DIR)'
> +# arm64 headers references arch/arm
> +ifneq ($(filter arm64,$(ARCH)),)
> + set -o pipefail; \
> + cd $(SOURCE_DIR); \
> + ( \
> + find arch/arm/include -name 'opcodes.h' -print; \
> + find $$(find arch/arm/include -name xen -type d -print) -print; \
> + ) \
> + | \
> + cpio -pd --preserve-modification-time '$(CURDIR)/$(DIR)'
> +endif
>
> dh_link /usr/lib/$(PACKAGE_NAME_KBUILD)/scripts $(BASE_DIR)/scripts
>
--
Ben Hutchings
Usenet is essentially a HUGE group of people passing notes in class.
- Rachel Kadel, `A Quick Guide to Newsgroup Etiquette'
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
