Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 11:09 -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 18:31 -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > > > > > > Between 3.16.7-ctk20 and 3.16.7-ctk25 the kexec functionality of the > > > Linux kernel was damaged.????The system I'm looking at uses a 3.3 kernel > > > to load the "real" kernel off a filesystem and kexec into that.????The 3.3 > > > kernel was able to successfully kexec into a 3.16.7-ctk20 kernel, but > > > is unable to kexec into a 3.16.7-ctk25 kernel.????However I found the > > > 3.16.7-ctk20 IS able to successfully kexec the 3.16.7-ctk25 kernel. > > Surely this is a bug in the built-in (3.3) kernel, not the new one? ??If > > there's something simple that can be done in the Debian kernel to work > > around this, we should do that, but otherwise you're stuck with this. > This is certainly a reasonable theory. Alas, I cannot speak to which of > these theories is correct. All I can say for certain is that something > changed between ctk20 and ctk25 which made the 3.3 kernel unable to kexec > ctk25. I'm under the impression as of 3.3 the kexec functionality was > supposed to be stable on MIPS, but that could be incorrect. > > I should also note, during the failed kexecs I would see the messages > from the 3.3 kernel saying the kexec was starting, but never see any > messages from the ctk25 kernel. Unless someone wants to send me a JTAG > decoder that is all I can say.
One of the MIPS porters may be able to help you, but I have no idea what to suggest. Are you using one of the linux-image packages or building from source with your own configuration? In the latter case, are you sure you used the same configuration for old and new kernels? > > > Doing a double-kexec does work around the issue, but it means I need to > > > hold onto that one magic kernel for the moment... > > > > > > In other news, it appears sometime between 3.3 and 3.10 there started > > > being a requirement for GCC 4.8 on mipsel. > > Packages in jessie must be buildable using compiler versions in jessie. > > That means either gcc-4.8 or gcc-4.9. > linux-source-3.16 is available as a backport to wheezy, which does not > feature gcc-4.8. That in no way contradicts what I said. :-) When I backport the linux source package from jessie to wheezy I change it to use gcc-4.6. But the linux-source-X.Y packages (which are a different thing to the linux source package!) don't specify any particular compiler version. You can choose that with the CC variable; otherwise the default compiler (specified by the gcc package) will be used. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
