On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 20:30 +0300, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: >> Can you please suggest, what to do next? Close this bugreport as >> invalid, and fill new one against n2_rng module in debian, or report >> first to lkml? Thanks. > [...] > > You should send this patch upstream (linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org and > sparcli...@vger.kernel.org mailing lists).
Ben, submitted to both mentioned mailing lists, it got to DaveM processing queue, see http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/sparclinux/list/?submitter=68078 As I told earlier, I'm not a kernel developer in any form, not even C/C++ programmer. I'm not sure I would be able to answer to any objections on this patch. But thanks anyway, probably someone else (oracle guys, with their linux for sparc [L4S] project) would be able to make this patch to kernel.
