Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:33:08AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:54:30PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>> > > This layout removes the indicator, where changes may be introduced
>> > > without breaking too much.
>> > experimental seems like a pretty fair indication.
>>
>> Only if you do regular cleanups of not longer used trees. Otherwise you
>> remain with
>>
>> sid/bla
>> experimental/bla
And why not use trunk for development and then a branch for sid? This
is more or less how XSF works nowadays.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
