On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:27:18PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:25:32PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:29:36PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to announce kernel-source and kernel-image-i386 2.4.27-10. > > > This is an update to 2.4.27-9, which is currently in unstable. > > > And I would like to propose it as the a candidate for sarge rc1 > > > > > > (Note: rc1, _not_ rc0, which will have 2.4.27-8, its frozen, gone, > > > no changes, bye-bye...) > > > > > > I will upload this to the debian archive tomorrow if there are no > > > complaints. > > > > > > Download: > > > http://debian.vergenet.net/testing/ > > > > > > Changes: > > > http://debian.vergenet.net/testing/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-10_i386.changes > > Take II. > > The packages are back up again, as is the ChangeLog. > Look for the ones dated 13th April. > > Unforunately I have one outstanding commit > (to 162_drivers-net-via-rhine-irq.diff) and > I have not tagged kernel-source as I am having > trouble with svn.debian.org - seems the disk is full. > Hopefully this will be resolved to.
Ok, 2.4.27-10 is shaping up as the kernel that wasn't. Seems that there are some mips changes, based on 2.4.27-9 that are pending, so I am going to hold off on the upload. Also, Dann Frazier has pointed out that the patch we have for CAN-2004-1057 may have some issues and has been superceeded upstream. So I am going to withdraw these images (again), untag in CVS, and look at readdressing this next week or the week after. Sorry for the confusion. If there turns out to be some stray -10 installatins out there I might just skip to -11 for when we actually make the release. But I don't think that is going to be neccessary. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
