On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:44:33PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:38:49AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:55:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Horms, > > > > The current d-i kernel image is linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 0.05. > > > > I am not sure which version of kernel-source this is based on, > > > > as a quick glance of the .dsc seems to indicate that the > > > > source dependancy is not versioned. However it too seems > > > > to be missing "m5823" and thus seems to not have the patch. > > > > > > Yes, and unfortunately Josh's changelog entry is exceedingly vague; but > > > from > > > the date, it would have to have been built against k-i-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-6 > > > AFAICT. > > > > Notice that i have adapted the powerpc kernels to copy the kernel-source > > changelog into the kernel-image file, where it shows up as : > > > > changelog-kernel-source.Debian.gz > > > > Maybe not the best naming scheme, but i believe we should make this a policy > > as soon as possible, and include the kernel-source changelog always in the > > kernel-images, so that there is no doubt of the above kind. > > Yes that is a good idea. Having a dependancy on kernel-tree-X.Y.Z-N is > also a good idea. Though if we move to single-source kernels, which I > know you are a strong proponent of, this problem all goes away, right?
Yeah, but in the meanwhile, we can't have the information not available, and we need to consider the sarge situation. I will investigate about adding the kernel-tree-X.Y.Z-N dependency in an automated way too. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
