On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:02:29AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:46:33PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > [cut] > > > BTW, if you find it usefull, snippet of log with uncommented DEBUG in > > > /etc/hotplug.d/default/default.hotplug follows: > > Thanks, that is most useful ineed. > > I am wondering if the reclassification made by > > /etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules is correct, given > > that the kenrel doesn't seem to think that the > > tun module (i.e. the tun module itself doesn't think) > > that tun is a net module. > Look at http://bugs.debian.org/129968, maybe it would give you a hint.
I am not sure how this relates > BTW, I placed 01tun.rules file with content: > KERNEL="tun", NAME="misc/%k", SYMLINK="net/%k" > and this annoying message does not appear anymore. > > It looks for me that hotplug should have an exception for net/tun (but not > net/tun?*) class and serve it as a misc device instead net. Am I right? The more I think about this problem, the less I think it is a bug at all. Is there any problem other than the debug message that you reported? With your workaround in place, is there any problem at all? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
