Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:43:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bad hardware
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2004 17:23:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 24 10:23:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cyclone.barak-online.net [212.150.48.116] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BoQFA-0000yZ-00; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 10:23:33 -0700
Received: from rakefet ([82.166.12.214]) by cyclone.barak-online.net
          (InterMail vK.4.04.00.00 201-232-137 license 
ddbfb5ca0577fb4501d00fa8328b2217)
          with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:25:35 +0300
Received: from shaul by rakefet with local (Exim 4.32)
        id 1BoQEd-0002GX-AH
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:22:59 +0300
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:22:58 +0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: boot problems
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
From: Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-source-2.6.7
Version: 2.6.7-3
Severity: normal

  Other then lots of

    Couldnt get a file descriptor referring to the console

lines when using *2.6.7-2* with a serial console, I can't see anything
wrong with *2.6.7-2*.

  Now to 2.6.7-3.
I have compiled it with the same configuration as -2.

  1) When I boot I get a kernel oops. Here are the messages that I could 
see on the screen:

esi: 000000296   edi: 00000008   ebp: d79b90f0   esp: c13a7dcc
ds: 007b    es: 007b   ss: 0068
Process mount (pid: 12, treadinfo=c13a6000 task=d79b90f0)
Stack: 00000008 00000001 d79b90f0 c01152c0 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000
       00000000 c12f3280 000009b7 d7994000 c02639a0 c8229bc8 00000000 00000244
       17994000 c0188291 d7e2dc00 00000244 00000004 00000000 0011abd1 d7e2dc00

Call Trace:
 [<c01152c0>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [<c0229bc8>] __down_failed+0x8/0xc
 [<c0188291>] .text.lock.inode+0x7d/0x8c
 [<c0131311>] page_cache_read+0xa1/0xe0
 [<c013163b>] filemap_nopage+0x2eb/0x390
 [<c013f2b3>] do_no_page+0xb3/0x310
 [<c013f710>] handle_mm_fault+0xe0/0x180
 [<c011397c>] do_page_fault+0x33c/0x52e
 [<c014c75c>] dentry_open+0x10c/0x240
 [<c0164271>] dput+0x31/0x220
 [<c014e3fb>] __fput+0xbb/0x120
 [<c014cbb9>] flip_close+0x59/0x90
 [<c0113640>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x52e
 [<c01065b5>] error_code+0x2d/0x38

Code: 8b 40 04 89 7c 24 10 89 4f 04 89 d7 89 44 24 14 89 08 ff 43

 <6> note: mount[12] exited with preemp_count 1
 

  2) Surprisingly, boot into single user and then ctrl+d to continue to
multi user mode seems to succeed. With a serial console, the boot
process seems to succeed as well though I get lots of 

    Couldnt get a file descriptor referring to the console

lines.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-2.pentium2.1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.7 depends on:
ii  binutils                   2.14.90.0.7-8 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  bzip2                      1.0.2-1       A high-quality block-sorting file 
ii  coreutils [fileutils]      5.0.91-2      The GNU core utilities

-- no debconf information
-- 
"If you have an apple and I have  an apple and we  exchange apples then
you and I will still each have  one apple. But  if you have an idea and I
have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two
ideas." -- George Bernard Shaw        (sent by  shaulk @ 013 . net . il)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 261259-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2004 22:43:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 28 15:43:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CCQgh-000340-00; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:43:11 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFFF5C069
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:43:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from baikonur.stro.at ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (baikonur [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 26180-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:43:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
        by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913095C00A
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:43:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CCQgq-0001MZ-1S
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:43:20 +0200
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:43:19 +0200
From: maks attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bad hardware
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


since memtest fails that's an hardware problem not a kernel bug.

--
maks
kernel janitor          http://janitor.kernelnewbies.org/


Reply via email to