Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:04:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line old patches
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2004 09:00:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 23 02:00:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0502.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.26]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BRopw-000128-00; Sun, 23 May 2004 02:00:05 -0700
Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (APuteaux-115-1-17-5.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr
[81.51.118.5])
by mwinf0502.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP
id E2A76E800507; Sun, 23 May 2004 10:59:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BRouf-0002Ob-00; Sun, 23 May 2004 11:04:57 +0200
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 11:04:57 +0200
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-patch-debian: should not include ea and acl
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.59
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,BLANK_LINES_80_90,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel
Version: 2.4.26-2
Severity: important
There are already packaged patches for ea and acl, and including them in the
debian patch is a duplication of effort that prevent users to use the
already-existing package.
I notice that someone asked for this in #229205, without any rationale, and
that this wish was applied, without any rationale recorded as well. This is
IMHO bad practice, and we should avoid this in the future.
In this particular case, _if_ we want to get acl+ea in our default kernels,
the best move I can see would be to make use of the existing patch package.
But I suppose that will cause problems because of the way
kernel-patch-debian is handled.
Basically, as I already suggested a long time ago, I think it would be much
better to have kernel-image packages build-depend on kernel-patch-debian.
Then we could make kernel-patch-debian depend on kernel-patch-acl if we want
it.
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
Package: kernel
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.23-k6+preempt+acl
Locale: LANG=français, LC_CTYPE=français
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 250478-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2004 22:04:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 28 15:04:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CCQ4s-0007rX-00; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:04:06 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C925C069
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:04:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from baikonur.stro.at ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (baikonur [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 19418-07 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:04:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187EB5C00A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:04:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CCQ51-0000tQ-FD
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:04:15 +0200
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:04:15 +0200
From: maks attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: old patches
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
the acl patches for 2.4 will not be included in main kernel,
please update your 2.4 patches. if you have interests in them,
2.6 anyway supports this.
