On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 05:08:07PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > > And why is no kernel-kbuild-2.4-* required for 2.4 images, if they need it?
I never got around to doing that. > >I did it that way to avoid the main kernel packages having a dependency > >on glibc. > > I think it's perfectly reasonable for kernel-_headers_ to depend on > glibc, but not for the images, of course. No that's not my concern. My concern is the source package's dependency on glibc which leads to propagation delays etc. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
